1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 93 A.D.2d
  5. 93 A.D.2d 374 (1983)
 

OBERSTEIN v. OBERSTEIN

93 A.D.2d 374 (1983)

Fred Oberstein, Appellant, v. Enid Oberstein, Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

May 3, 1983

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Philip L. Friedman for appellant.

Robert C. Agee of counsel (Walter J. Handelman, attorney), for respondent.

KUPFERMAN, J. P., and LYNCH, J., concur with KASSAL, J.; SANDLER and SULLIVAN, JJ., dissent in an opinion by SULLIVAN, J.

KASSAL, J.

The question which confronts us on this appeal is the continued viability of the legal principle expressed in Shiffman v Shiffman (57 A.D.2d 519) in Gleeson v Gleeson (69 A.D.2d 964, mot for lv to app dsmd 47 N.Y.2d 709) and in other cases, holding that where the support obligations of the parties are fixed by a subsisting separation agreement, disclosure...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases