1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.Super.
  4. 319 Pa.Super.
  5. 319 Pa.Super. 147 (1983)
 

HANKIN v. HANKIN

319 Pa.Super. 147 (1983)

465 A.2d 1272

Max A. HANKIN and Janet Hankin v. Moe Henry HANKIN, Sabina Hankin, Perch P. Hankin, Gertrude Hankin, Benjamin R. Shanken and Pauline Shanken, Estate of Samuel Hankin and Harriet Hankin. Appeal of Moe Henry HANKIN, Sabina Hankin, Perch P. Hankin, Gertrude Hankin, Benjamin R. Shanken and Pauline Shanken.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Filed September 23, 1983.

Petition for Allowance of Appeal Granted August 22, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Philip D. Weiss, Norristown, for appellants.

Franklin Poul, Philadelphia, for Max Hankin, etc., appellees.

Theodore R. Mann, Philadelphia, for Moe Hankin, et al., appellees.

Before ROWLEY, McEWEN and WATKINS, JJ.

ROWLEY, Judge:

This action involves the liquidation of a family partnership, which was dissolved in 1977. This is the fourth time that the controversy has been before our court. See Hankin v. Hankin, 279 Pa.Super. 179, 420 A.2d 1090 (1980); Hankin v. Hankin, 302 Pa.Super. 295, 448 A.2d 1049 (1981);

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases