STATE EX REL. BLAKE v. SHOEMAKER

No. 82-986.

4 Ohio St. 3d 42 (1983)

THE STATE, EX REL. BLAKE, APPELLANT, v. SHOEMAKER, ACTING CHIEF, ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided March 16, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Richard H. Blake, pro se.

Mr. William J. Brown, attorney general, and Mr. Dennis L. Sipe, for appellees John Shoemaker, Acting Chief, Adult Parole Authority, Clarence Clark, Chairman, Ohio Adult Parole Board, George Bustamonte, Member, Ohio Adult Parole Board, and Arnold Jago, Superintendent, London Correctional Institution.


Per Curiam.

The basis of appellant's argument is that his right to parole consideration provided in R.C. 2967.03 automatically creates a liberty interest sufficient to establish a right to procedural due process. This contention was rejected in Greenholtz v. Nebraska Penal Inmates (1979), 442 U.S. 1, with the exception of where the state statute itself creates an expectancy of release. The Nebraska statute before...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases