1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 307 S.E.2d
  5. 307 S.E.2d 156 (1983)
 

STATE v. THOMPSON

No. 150PA83.

307 S.E.2d 156 (1983)

309 N.C. 421

STATE of North Carolina v. Mack Leo THOMPSON.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 27, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rufus L. Edmisten, Atty. Gen. by William N. Farrell, Associate Atty. Gen., Raleigh, for the State.

Nora B. Henry, Asst. Appellate Defender, Raleigh, for defendant-appellee.

MEYER, Justice.

With respect to the State's contention that the trial judge properly considered in aggravation that the offense was committed for pecuniary gain, we find no evidence in this record that the defendant was hired or paid to commit the offense—evidence which we have recently held to be necessary to support a finding of this factor. See State v. Abdullah, 309 N.C. 63, 306 S.E.2d 100

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases