1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 188 N.J.
  5. 188 N.J. Super. 274 (1983)
 

BERRIE v. BERRIE

188 N.J. Super. 274 (1983)

457 A.2d 76

RUSSELL BERRIE, PLAINTIFF, v. KATHY BERRIE, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division Bergen County.

Decided January 7, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sidney Slauson, for plaintiff (Theodore Sager Meth of counsel and on the brief).

Sheldon Liebowitz, for defendant (Liebowitz, Liebowitz & Clarke, attorneys).

Edward J. Nowakoski, for Wallace Berrie (Kraft & Hughes, attorneys).

HAMER, J.J.D.R.C. (temporarily assigned).

The issue presented here is the extent to which a nonparty should be compelled to disclose in discovery proceedings information which the deponent considers confidential but which may provide collateral or supportive evidence of the value of a property subject to equitable distribution in the present case. The question is raised on a motion by Wallace Berrie, plaintiff's brother, to quash a subpoena duces tecum. The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases