FONTENOT v. FONTENOT

No. 82-468.

427 So.2d 27 (1983)

Adam B. FONTENOT, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Curtis L. FONTENOT, et ux., Defendant-Appellant.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

February 3, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Tate, Tate & Tate, Paul C. Tate, Sr., Mamou, for defendant-appellant.

A. Gaynor Soileau, Ville Platte, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before STOKER, YELVERTON and KNOLL, JJ.


KNOLL, Judge.

This is an appeal to rescind and annul an act of sale on the grounds of lesion beyond moiety and incompetency. From the judgment nullifying the sale, the defendants, Curtis L. Fontenot and his wife, Ruby Johnson Fontenot, have perfected this appeal. The trial court carefully considered this case, assigning written reasons for his judgment. Finding that the trial court did not commit manifest error, we affirm.

The issues on appeal are:

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases