KAR PRODUCTS, INC. v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZ.

No. 1 CA-IC 2964.

139 Ariz. 315 (1983)

678 P.2d 500

KAR PRODUCTS, INCORPORATED, Petitioner Employer, Royal Globe Company, Petitioner Carrier, v. The INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZONA, Respondent, Pamela ConCannon, Widow of Martin ConCannon, deceased, Respondent Employee.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department B.

Reconsideration Denied January 6, 1984.

Review Denied March 13, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bury & Moeller by J. Michael Moeller, Tucson, for petitioner employer and carrier.

James A. Overholt, Chief Counsel by Roger W. Rea, Phoenix, for respondent.


OPINION

CORCORAN, Judge.

This is a special action review of an Industrial Commission order dismissing for lack of jurisdiction a widow's petition to commute death benefits to a lump sum. One legal issue is presented: whether A.R.S. § 23-1067 allows commutation of death benefits awarded under A.R.S. § 23-1046(A)(2). Because it does not, we affirm the order of dismissal.

The facts are simple and undisputed. The widow's late husband was killed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases