STATE v. PARSON

No. 82-601.

6 Ohio St. 3d 442 (1983)

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. PARSON, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided September 7, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Simon L. Leis, Jr., prosecuting attorney, and Mr. William E. Breyer, for appellee.

Messrs. Frost, Freytag & Hunter and Mr. Warren M. Enders, for appellant.


J. P. CELEBREZZE, J.

I

Appellant's first proposition of law is a challenge predicated upon Crim. R. 16 relating to the regulation of discovery in criminal trials. That rule provides, in relevant part, as follows:

"(A) Demand for discovery. Upon written request each party shall forthwith provide the discovery herein allowed. Motions for discovery shall certify that demand for discovery has been made...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED


OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases