Defendant's prior motion to prohibit the use for any purpose, including cross-examination, of a statement impermissibly obtained from him after an arrest warrant had been issued was denied by this court (PINE, J.) on the basis of the District Attorney's concession that it would not be used as evidence-in-chief (see People v Samuels,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.