Per Curiam.
By supplemental petition dated August 22, 1982, the Grievance Committee of the Fifth Judicial District charged that respondent used bank funds improperly for his own benefit in violation of the Code of Professional Responsibility. Respondent denied any wrongdoing and a referee was appointed by order of this court.
The referee found, inter alia, that on October 9, 1979 respondent made a deposit of $1,061.50 to his law office checking...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
