1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 112 Wis.2d
  5. 112 Wis.2d 324 (1983)
 

DeBARDELEBEN v. ETHICS BOARD

No. 82-514.

112 Wis.2d 324 (1983)

332 N.W.2d 826

Arthur DEBARDELEBEN, Petitioner-Respondent, v. ETHICS BOARD, an administrative body created and regulated by Subchapter III, Chapter 19, Wisconsin Statutes, 1977, Respondent-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided March 8, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant the cause was submitted on the briefs of Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general, and John C. Murphy, assistant attorney general.

For the respondent the cause was submitted on the brief of DeBardeleben & Snyder of Park Falls.

Brief amicus curiae of the State Bar of Wisconsin was filed by Fiorenza, Weiss, Amato, Hodan & Belongia, S.C., John A. Fiorenza and Dominic S. Amato, of Milwaukee.

Before Foley, P.J., Dean and Cane, JJ.

FOLEY, P.J.

The circuit court reversed an ethics board order fining Arthur DeBardeleben $500 for violating sec. 19.44(1) (f), Stats.,1 a financial disclosure requirement for public officials and employees. In implementing sec. 19.44(1) (f), the board required DeBardeleben, an attorney and a former appointee to the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System, to disclose the names...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases