JOHNSON, Judge.
The sole question presented for review is whether defendant is entitled to a new trial because of the trial court's refusal to give his requested instruction limiting the purposes for which the jury could consider the evidence that a "mug shot" was taken of the defendant four months before the charged offense occurred. For the reasons set forth below, we hold that the trial court's refusal to give the limiting instruction
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
