1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 301 S.E.2d
  5. 301 S.E.2d 126 (1983)
 

STATE v. WARREN

No. 8219SC1046.

301 S.E.2d 126 (1983)

STATE of North Carolina v. David WARREN, Edward Williams and Earl Leon Williams.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

April 5, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Atty. Gen. Rufus L. Edmisten by Associate Atty. K. Michele Allison, Raleigh, for the State.

Bell & Browne, P.A. by Charles T. Browne, Asheboro, and The Legal Center by C. Richard Tate, Jr., High Point, for defendants-appellants.

WHICHARD, Judge.

Defendants contend the affidavit underlying the warrant was insufficient because it failed to provide sufficient underlying facts and circumstances from which the magistrate could determine the informant's basis of knowledge and credibility. We disagree.

An "affidavit is sufficient if it supplies reasonable cause to believe that the proposed search for evidence of the commission of the designated criminal offense will reveal the presence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases