GURKIN v. SIEGEL


122 Misc.2d 302 (1983)

Alfred Gurkin, Plaintiff, v. Matthew Siegel et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County.

December 22, 1983


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Smith, Panish & Shapiro (Sam Panish of counsel), for plaintiff. Matthew Siegel and Doris Gurkin, defendants pro se.


MICHAEL J. DONTZIN, J.

This is a motion to dismiss a cause of action predicated on an alleged violation of section 13 of the General Business Law, and raises the issue of whether the plaintiff has a private right of action for a violation of this statute which is penal in nature.

Section 13 of the General Business Law provides as follows: "Whoever maliciously procures any process in a civil action to be served on Saturday, upon any person who...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases