1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 189 N.J.
  5. 189 N.J. Super. 231 (1983)
 

STILL v. OHIO CAS. INS. CO.

189 N.J. Super. 231 (1983)

459 A.2d 1195

DORIS STILL, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE OHIO CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 21, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ira Rabkin argued the cause for appellant (Molotsky, Rabkin & Gross, attorneys).

F. Michael Daily, Jr. argued the cause for respondent (Montano, Summers, Mullen & Manuel, attorneys).

Before Judges FRITZ, JOELSON and PETRELLA.

The opinion of the court was delivered by FRITZ, P.J.A.D.

This appeal from a summary judgment in favor of defendant is yet another chapter in the volume of cases considering statute of limitations questions in matters arising out of claims under the New Jersey Automobile Reparation Reform Act (N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1 et seq.), commonly referred to as the No-Fault Act. As does its predecessors referred to herein, it involves consideration

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases