1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 100 Wn.2d
  5. 100 Wn.2d 313 (1983)
 

BOYLES v. WASH. LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS' AND FIRE FIGHTERS' RETIREMENT BD.

No. 49085-6.

100 Wn.2d 313 (1983)

669 P.2d 465

RICHARD E. BOYLES, Respondent, v. WASHINGTON LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS' AND FIRE FIGHTERS' RETIREMENT BOARD, Petitioner.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

September 15, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kenneth O. Eikenberry, Attorney General, Rochelle E. Wienker, Assistant, and Clifford D. Foster, Special Assistant, for petitioner.

Reaugh & Prescott, by J.E. Fischnaller, for respondent.

ROSELLINI, J.

Petitioner, Washington Law Enforcement Officers' and Fire Fighters' Retirement Board,1 challenges a Superior Court ruling which reversed the Board's determination that respondent Richard E. Boyles was not entitled to retirement benefits. The sole issue raised by the petition for review is whether the Court of Appeals applied the proper test for determining whether respondent was entitled to retirement benefits. We find that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases