1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 188 N.J.
  5. 188 N.J. Super. 212 (1983)
 

H.P. HIGGS CO. v. MADISON

188 N.J. Super. 212 (1983)

457 A.2d 43

H.P. HIGGS COMPANY, INC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT AND CROSS-APPELLANT, v. THE BOROUGH OF MADISON, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT AND CROSS-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 8, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Herbert A. Vogel argued the cause for appellant (Vogel & Chait, attorneys; Richard C. Erdman on the brief).

William C. Slattery argued the cause for respondent (Rosen, Gelman & Weiss, attorneys; James H. Laskey on the brief).

Before Judges MILMED, MORTON I. GREENBERG and FURMAN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by MORTON I. GREENBERG, J.A.D.

This matter comes before this court on appeal and cross-appeal of judgments entered in the Superior Court, Law Division, following a nonjury trial. The decision of Judge Bangiola, the trial judge, on the principal issues in the case is reported at 184 N.J.Super. 355 (Law Div. 1982).

Plaintiff, a New...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases