1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.C.
  4. 279 S.C.
  5. 279 S.C. 109 (1983)
 

WINDHAM v. HONEYCUTT

21912

279 S.C. 109 (1983)

302 S.E.2d 856

Stanley WINDHAM, Respondent-Appellant, v. Hazel M. HONEYCUTT, also known as Elizabeth Hazel Black Honeycutt, formerly known as Hazel M. Black, Appellant-Respondent.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

May 3, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James R. Honeycutt, Fort Mill, for appellant-respondent.

Hayes, Brunson & Gatlin, Rock Hill, for respondent-appellant.

May 3, 1983.

NESS, Justice:

This is an action for specific performance of a real estate contract brought by respondent buyer against appellant seller. The trial judge found the buyer entitled to specific performance. We affirm.

First, appellant asserts the trial court erred in hearing the matter in less than ninety days from the date of the initial pleadings in violation of Circuit Court Rule 26(7)(e). The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases