LUDWIG v. GOSLINE


191 N.J. Super. 188 (1983)

465 A.2d 946

CHARLES LUDWIG AND MARGARET LUDWIG, HUSBAND AND WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. ANDREW J. GOSLINE AND MARY GOSLINE, HUSBAND AND WIFE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided August 31, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Anschelewitz, Barr, Ansell & Bonello, attorneys for appellants (James M. McGovern, Jr., on the brief).

Steven C. Rubin, attorney for respondents.

Before Judges BOTTER, POLOW and BRODY.


The opinion of the court was delivered by BRODY, J.A.D.

This is a suit between neighbors occupying homes on adjacent properties in Ocean Grove. The issue raised on appeal is whether defendants acquired by prescription an easement approximately six inches wide over plaintiffs' property along their common boundary. The adverse use occurred as a result of the placement of defendants' concrete walk over the boundary line. Plaintiffs and defendants hold leases, not deeds...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases