1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Mich.
  4. 126 Mich.
  5. 126 Mich. App. 240 (1983)
 

BOULET v. BRUNSWICK CORP.

Docket No. 61773.

126 Mich. App. 240 (1983)

336 N.W.2d 904

BOULET v. BRUNSWICK CORPORATION

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided June 6, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frimet, Bellamy, Gilchrist & Lites, P.C. (by Frederick B. Bellamy and Dan Ellis Champney), for plaintiffs.

Ogne, Jinks, Ecclestone & Alberts, P.C. (by Wayne L. Ogne and Bryan Cermak), for Lawrence Kaye and Mel Anderson.

Before: T.M. BURNS, P.J., and V.J. BRENNAN and WAHLS, JJ.

Leave to appeal applied for.

V.J. BRENNAN, J.

The facts are set forth in the dissenting opinion. The sole issue for our consideration is whether the trial court erred in granting defendants Lawrence Kaye and Mel Anderson's motion for summary judgment on the basis that they were immune from suit because of governmental immunity. MCL 691.1407; MSA 3.996(107).

We find no error on the part of the trial court. A public school in the operation of its athletic...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases