1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.
  4. 34 Pa.
  5. 34 Pa. D. & C. 3d 285 (1983)
 

PEE JAY'S PACKING CO. v. MAKFIL SYSTEMS

No. 554 September term, 1979.

34 Pa. D. & C. 3d 285 (1983)

Pee Jay's Packing Company, Inc. v. Makfil Systems

Common Pleas Court of Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania.

September 13, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel J. Ryan, for defendant Burford Corporation.

Morton Gordesky, for plaintiff Pee Jay's Packing Company.

Edward B. Joseph, for defendant Makfil Systems.

TAKIFF, J., September 13, 1983.

Plaintiff, Pee Jay's Packing Company, Inc., instituted this action in trespass and assumpsit against defendants Makfil Systems and Burford Corporation to recover direct, incidental and consequential damages it allegedly sustained as a result of the inadequate performance and malfunctioning of a fruit packaging machine manufactured, in whole or in part, by Makfil, Burford and other unnamed companies and purchased by plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases