PACIFICA CORP. v. CITY OF CAMARILLO

Docket No. 68357.

149 Cal.App.3d 168 (1983)

196 Cal. Rptr. 670

PACIFICA CORPORATION, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY OF CAMARILLO et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Seven.

November 23, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Raymond C. Clayton and Cohen, Alexander & Clayton for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Royal M. Sorensen and Colin Lennard, City Attorneys, Burke, Williams & Sorensen, Mark C. Allen, Jr., Katherine E. Stone, Virginia R. Pesola, David D. Dahl, T. Dale Pease and Pease & Barron for Defendants and Respondents.


OPINION

PAEZ, J.*

Appellant Pacifica Corporation (Pacifica) appeals from a judgment denying its petition for a peremptory writ of mandate under Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.5. By its petition Pacifica sought to compel respondents City of Camarillo (City) and the Camarillo City Council (Council) to grant its 1982 application for a residential development allotment under the City's residential growth...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases