MTR AMES v. SMOOT


98 A.D.2d 216 (1983)

In the Matter of Amyas Ames et al., Respondents, v. William S. Smoot et al., Comprising the Board of Trustees of The Incorporated Village of Laurel Hollow, Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

December 27, 1983


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Farrell, Fritz, Caemmerer, Cleary, Barnosky & Armentano, P. C. (George J. Farrell, Jr., John M. Armentano and Ellen M. Young of counsel), for appellants.

Eisenman, Allsop & Strack (James A. Eisenman of counsel), and Chadourne, Parke, Whiteside & Wolff (Paul G. Pennoyer, Jr., Charles K. O'Neill and James C. La Forge of counsel), for respondents (one brief filed).

GIBBONS and GULOTTA, JJ., concur with LAZER, J. P.; WEINSTEIN, J., dissents and votes to affirm the judgment with an opinion in which RUBIN, J., concurs.


LAZER, J. P.

Has the enactment of article 33 of the Environmental Conservation Law (ECL) pre-empted the field of pesticide regulation and thus precluded local governments from legislating in that area? Since we believe that it has, we conclude that the local law enacted by the Incorporated Village of Laurel Hollow prohibiting aerial spraying of pesticides was void and that it could be repealed without the filing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases