STATE v. RUTLEDGE

No. 822SC1058.

302 S.E.2d 12 (1983)

STATE of North Carolina v. Ronald RUTLEDGE.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

May 3, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Atty. Gen., Rufus L. Edmisten by Sp. Deputy Atty. Gen., Jo Anne Sanford, Raleigh, for the State.

Charles M. Vincent, Greenville, for defendant, appellant.


HEDRICK, Judge.

The defendant purports to bring forward three questions for review: (1) whether the trial court erred in not summarily allowing defendant's motion to suppress, (2) whether the trial court's conclusion, after hearing evidence on the motion, was against the weight of the evidence and (3) whether the court erred in failing to make findings of fact. Simply stated, the sole question raised by the defendant's motion to suppress is whether the officer's affidavit...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases