1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 99 Wn.2d
  5. 99 Wn.2d 206 (1983)
 

ADKINSON v. DIGBY, INC.

No. 49000-7.

99 Wn.2d 206 (1983)

660 P.2d 756

CERTIFICATION FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT IN JAMES R. ADKINSON, ET AL, Appellants, v. DIGBY, INC., ET AL, Appellees.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

March 24, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

A. Lee Petersen, for appellants.

Chris J. Rigos, Nicholas C. Newman, and Lee, Smart, Cook & Martin, P.S., Inc., for appellees.

DIMMICK, J.

The following issue was certified by the United States Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals:

Is an action timely filed under RCW 4.16.170 if the complaint is filed on the last day permitted under the relevant statute of limitations and the defendant, although not served with process within 90 days thereafter, files a voluntary notice of appearance within those 90 days?

Our answer is no.

The stipulated facts reveal the following chronology...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases