1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 139 Ariz.
  5. 139 Ariz. 129 (1983)
 

ARMSTRONG v. HOOKER

No. 2 CA-CIV 4966.

139 Ariz. 129 (1983)

677 P.2d 292

Herbert W. ARMSTRONG, Petitioner, v. The Honorable Robert J. HOOKER, Judge of the Superior Court, in and for the County of Pima, Respondent, and Ramona ARMSTRONG and Ettinger & Deckter, P.C., Real Parties in Interest.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2.

Review Denied February 22, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wolfe & Ostapuk, Chartered by David K. Wolfe, Tucson, Ervin, Cohen & Jessup by Allan Browne, Beverly Hills, Cal., Miller & Pitt, P.C. by Gerald Maltz, Tucson, for petitioner.

Ettinger & Deckter, P.C. by Daniel C. Gloria and Louis L. Deckter, Tucson, for real party in interest Ramona Armstrong.

OPINION

HATHAWAY, Judge.

This special action arises out of the request of the real party in interest, Ramona Armstrong, for additional temporary attorney's fees in a pending dissolution action. A brief chronology of events in the action below is necessary as a background to our disposition of the case. For convenience, the parties will be referred to as designated in the superior court action.

The petition for dissolution was filed in April 1982. On...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases