1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 144 Cal.App.3d
  5. 144 Cal.App.3d 123 (1983)
 

EL DORADO UN. HIGH SCH DIST v. CT. OF PLACERVILLE

Docket No. 21989.

144 Cal.App.3d 123 (1983)

192 Cal. Rptr. 480

EL DORADO UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CITY OF PLACERVILLE et al., Defendants and Appellants; MACE LUMSDEN et al., Real Parties in Interest and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

June 21, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Daryl J. McKinstry, City Attorney, for Defendants and Appellants.

Riley, Petersen, Combellack & Culver, Riley, Petersen & Combellack and Michael E. Petersen for Real Parties in Interest and Appellants.

McDonough, Holland & Allen, G. Richard Brown and Susan S. Franceschi for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

REGAN, Acting P.J.

This is an appeal by the City of Placerville (City) and Mace Lumsden and Lumsden, Inc. (Lumsden) from a judgment granting the El Dorado Union High School District's (District) petition for writ of mandate and an injunction. The trial court set aside City's approval of a tentative subdivision map for a proposed residential development and an environmental impact report (EIR) for that project, and prohibited...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases