MUKA v. HANCOCK, ESTABROOK


120 Misc.2d 146 (1983)

Betty O. Muka, Plaintiff, v. Hancock, Estabrook, Ryan, Shove & Hust et al., Defendant.

Supreme Court, Onondaga County.

June 1, 1983


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hancock, Estabrook, Ryan, Shove & Hust, defendants pro se. Betty O. Muka, plaintiff pro se.


JOHN R. TENNEY, J.

Plaintiff, appearing pro se, has commenced a series of actions against numerous defendants. Defendants have moved to dismiss the complaints for failure to state a cause of action, and this motion is granted, with costs.

Defendants also have moved to permanently enjoin prosecution of suits by plaintiff appearing pro se. It is contended that plaintiff has repeatedly engaged in a course of conduct of commencing repetitious...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases