1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 139 Ariz.
  5. 139 Ariz. 124 (1983)
 

GRINNELL v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZ.

No. 1 CA-IC 2751.

139 Ariz. 124 (1983)

677 P.2d 287

Mary Ann GRINNELL, Petitioner Employee, v. The INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZONA, Respondent, Ken Sewell, Inc., Respondent Employer, Vigilant Insurance Company, Respondent Carrier.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department C.

Review Denied January 31, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Tretschok, McNamara & Clymer, P.C. by Patrick R. McNamara, Tucson, for petitioner.

James A. Overholt, Chief Counsel, The Industrial Com'n of Arizona, Phoenix, for respondent.

Moore & Long by Joseph L. Moore, Phoenix, for respondents employer and carrier.

OPINION

FROEB, Judge.

This is a review of a denial of a petition to reopen based on new, additional or previously undiscovered disability or condition. We find that the petitioner is precluded from reopening her claim for failing to comply with A.R.S. § 23-1023(C) and affirm the award of the Industrial Commission.

On March 24, 1976, petitioner Mary Ann Grinnell sustained injuries in a car accident in the course of and arising out of her employment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases