MTR OF ENRIGHT v. SIEDLECKI


59 N.Y.2d 195 (1983)

In the Matter of Dennis L. Enright, Respondent, v. Andrew F. Siedlecki, as Judge of the County Court of Tioga County, et al., Appellants. In the Matter of Arthur W. Huntzinger, Respondent, v. Andrew F. Siedlecki, as Judge of the County Court of Tioga County, et al., Appellants.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided June 9, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert J. Simpson, District Attorney, for appellants.

Robert L. Miller and Gerald A. Keene for Dennis L. Enright, respondent.

Robert L. Miller and Gerald A. Keen for Arthur William Huntzinger, respondent.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN and WACHTLER concur with Judge MEYER; Judges JONES and SIMONS dissent and vote to affirm in a memorandum.


MEYER, J.

Manifest necessity for the declaration of a mistrial in a criminal case exists when after opening statements referring to a confession have been made, the prosecutor discovers a Miranda warnings statement indicating that defendant had requested counsel and the confession is, after a hearing, suppressed. Manifest necessity likewise exists when an essential defense witness becomes unavailable;...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases