HARRINGTON v. CITY OF CHICAGO

No. 82-1379.

116 Ill. App.3d 137 (1983)

452 N.E.2d 26

JAMES HARRINGTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THE CITY OF CHICAGO et al., Defendants-Appellees.

Appellate Court of Illinois — First District (2nd Division).

Opinion filed June 28, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph A. Rosin & Associates, Ltd., of Chicago (Harold Z. Kaplan, of counsel), for appellant.

Stanley Garber, Corporation Counsel, of Chicago (Jerome A. Siegan and Maureen Kelly Ivory, Assistant Corporation Counsel, of counsel), for appellees.


Judgment affirmed.

JUSTICE STAMOS delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiff James Harrington initiated this class action against defendant city of Chicago, the class consisting of those holding tort judgments against the city. The action was for a declaratory judgment that section 3 of the Interest Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1981, ch. 17, par. 6403), which imposes a lesser rate of judgment interest on governmental...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases