CONTINENTAL BANK OF PA. v. BARCLAY RIDING ACAD.


93 N.J. 153 (1983)

459 A.2d 1163

CONTINENTAL BANK OF PENNSYLVANIA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BARCLAY RIDING ACADEMY, INC., NOW KNOWN AS BARCLAY EQUESTRIAN CENTER, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided May 9, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George F. Kugler, Jr., argued the cause for appellant (Archer & Greiner, attorneys; Morton Newman and William E. Taylor, III, members of the Pennsylvania bar, and Stephen M. Orlofsky, of counsel).

W. Barry Rank argued the cause for respondent (Weston, Kravitz & Rank, attorneys).


The opinion of the Court was delivered by GARIBALDI, J.

This is an action to foreclose a mortgage given by Barclay Riding Academy, Inc. ("Barclay")1 to Continental Bank of Pennsylvania ("Continental"). At issue is whether the mortgage is void because (1) it violates the anti-tying provisions of Section 1972(1)(C) of the Bank Holding Company Act, 12 U.S.C. §§ 1971-1978, as amended (the "Act"); (2) it was given without consideration...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases