PAYNE v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA

No. 16428-PR.

136 Ariz. 105 (1983)

664 P.2d 649

Donald PAYNE, Petitioner, v. The INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZONA, Respondent, Pima County, Respondent Employer, Home Insurance Company, Respondent Carrier.

Supreme Court of Arizona, In Banc.

Rehearing Denied June 14, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James A. Overholt, Acting Chief Counsel, The Industrial Commission of Arizona, Phoenix, for respondent.

Bury & Moeller, P.A. by Marshall Humphrey III, J. Michael Moeller, for respondent employer-carrier.

Tretschok, McNamara & Clymer, P.C. by Dale D. Tretschok, Tucson, for petitioner.


CAMERON, Justice.

We granted the petition of Donald Payne to review the opinion and decision of the Court of Appeals which affirmed the Industrial Commission in denying claimant's petition to reopen. We have jurisdiction pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-120.24 and Rule 23, Arizona Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, 17A A.R.S.

Although the Court of Appeals considered multiple issues, we accepted review to consider only one question, and that is whether there was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases