Per Curiam.
This cause presents the issue of whether the writ of mandamus was properly denied. Appellant attacks the decision of the court of appeals on four grounds.
First, appellant contends that there was no evidence upon which the commission could reasonably have relied with regard to their decision affirming the determination that appellant suffers a permanent partial disability of forty-five percent.
The evidence before the commission...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
