Per Curiam.
The dispositive question in this appeal is whether Henderson was a proper party in the supplemental litigation. If the trial court had not dismissed Henderson as a party, then certain statements allegedly made by Henderson to the appellees and their attorney at the hospital to which appellees were taken after the accident would stand as party admissions, which could properly be introduced into evidence pursuant to Evid. R. 801(D)(2).
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.