1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 193 N.J.
  5. 193 N.J. Super. 39 (1983)
 

RODRIGUEZ v. N.J. SPORTS & EXPOSITION AUTHORITY & PINKERTON'S, INC.

193 N.J. Super. 39 (1983)

472 A.2d 146

CRISPIN RODRIGUEZ AND SONIA RODRIGUEZ, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. NEW JERSEY SPORTS & EXPOSITION AUTHORITY AND PINKERTON'S, INC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 2, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David A. Bolson argued the cause for appellants (Friedman, Carney & Wilson, attorneys; David A. Bolson, of counsel and on the brief).

Roger C. Wilson argued the cause for respondent New Jersey Sports & Exposition Authority (Zucker, Facher & Zucker, attorneys; Roger C. Wilson, of counsel and on the brief).

Robert J. Maloof argued the cause for respondent Pinkerton's, Inc. (Hein, Smith & Berezin, attorneys; Robert J. Maloof, of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges MICHELS, KING and DREIER.

The Opinion of the Court was delivered by MICHELS, P.J.A.D.

Plaintiffs Crispin Rodriguez and Sonia Rodriguez appeal from summary judgments of the Law Division entered in favor of defendants New Jersey Sports & Exposition Authority (Authority) and Pinkerton's, Inc. (Pinkerton's) that, based upon the immunity provisions of the New Jersey Tort Claims Act, dismissed their complaint for personal injuries and property damages. N.J.S.A. 59:1-1, et seq....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases