CONNELL v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO.

Appeals Nos. 83-841, 83-842.

722 F.2d 1542 (1983)

Jerry F. CONNELL, Gary F. Burns and Conelco, Inc., Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO., a Corporation, Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

November 23, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas E. Davis, Gadsden, Ala., argued for appellants.

Walther E. Wyss, Chicago, Ill., argued for appellee. With him on brief were Neil M. Rose and C. Ronald Olbrysh, Chicago, Ill.

Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, SMITH, Circuit Judge, and COWEN, Senior Circuit Judge.


MARKEY, Chief Judge.

Jerry F. Connell, et al. (Connell), appeals from a judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama Middle Division holding U.S. Patent No. 3,459,199 (the '199 patent), issued in 1969 for a hair "teasing and unsnarling implement", invalid for obviousness under 35 U.S.C. § 103, and finding noninfringement by certain hair curler devices. Sears, Roebuck and Co. (Sears), cross...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases