DOE v. BD. ON PROF. RESP. OF D.C. COURT OF APPEALS

No. 83-1272.

717 F.2d 1424 (1983)

John DOE, Esq. c/o his counsel, Perito, Duerk, Carlson and Pinco, P.C., Appellant, v. BOARD ON PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY OF the DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS, et al.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided September 16, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul L. Perito, Glenn H. Carlson and Robert E. Pokusa, Washington, D.C., were on the motion for stay of enforcement of order and subpoenas, for appellant.

Judith W. Rogers, Corp. Counsel, Charles L. Reischel, Deputy Corp. Counsel, Lutz Alexander Prager, Asst. Corp. Counsel, and Martha J. Tomich and Fred Grabowsky, Asst. Bar Counsel, Washington, D.C., were on the motion to dismiss and opposition to motion for stay for appellees, Bd. on Professional Responsibility.

Before MIKVA and EDWARDS, Circuit Judges, and MacKINNON, Senior Circuit Judge.


Opinion PER CURIAM.

MOTION TO DISMISS

MOTION FOR STAY OF ENFORCEMENT OF ORDER AND SUBPOENAS

PER CURIAM:

Pursuant to appellant's Motion for Stay of Enforcement of Order and Subpoenas and appellees' Motion to Dismiss Appeal, we review today an order of the district court denying the appellant's motion to quash subpoenas issued by the Board on Professional Responsibility ("the Board") of the District...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases