1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 191 N.J.
  5. 191 N.J. Super. 22 (1983)
 

SPRING MOTORS DISTRIBUTORS v. FORD MOTOR CO.

191 N.J. Super. 22 (1983)

465 A.2d 530

SPRING MOTORS DISTRIBUTORS, INC., A CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY; CLARK EQUIPMENT COMPANY, A CORPORATION; CLARK TRANSMISSION, A DIVISION OF CLARK EQUIPMENT COMPANY AND TURNPIKE FORD TRUCK SALES, INC., A CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided August 29, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Krevsky & Silber, attorneys for appellant (Fred Rabinowitz, on the brief).

Pitney, Hardin, Kipp & Szuch, attorneys for respondents Ford Motor Company and Turnpike Ford Truck Sales, Inc. (J. Michael Nolan, Jr., on the brief).

Crummy, Del Deo, Dolan & Purcell, attorneys for respondent Clark Equipment Company (Richard S. Zackin and John H. Klock, on the brief).

Before Judges KING and McELROY.

The opinion of the court was delivered by KING, J.A.D.

This issue is presented to us: May there be a recovery for economic loss, in addition to recovery for damages for personal injury and property loss, under the doctrine of strict liability in tort? We conclude that recovery of consequential economic damages under the doctrine of strict liability in tort is permitted in this jurisdiction, especially since the decision of the Supreme Court in H. Rosenblum, Inc...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases