SHULMAN, Chief Judge.
Appellant was convicted of kidnapping and robbery. In his sole enumerated error, he questions the trial court's refusal to allow a witness to give his opinion of appellant's mental condition at the time of arrest.
"The presumption of sanity may be rebutted `by evidence of the mental condition of the accused at the time of the offense, or that before and after the offense which tends to show his condition at the time of the offense.' ...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
