1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 576 F.Supp.
  5. 576 F.Supp. 1458 (1983)
 

SEAMON v. BELL TELEPHONE CO. OF PA.

Civ. A. No. 83-1801.

576 F.Supp. 1458 (1983)

Eileen SEAMON and Michael Seamon, her husband, Plaintiffs, v. The BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF PENNSYLVANIA, Defendant.

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania.

December 28, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kenneth Behrend, Pittsburgh, Pa., for plaintiffs.

Edward N. Stoner, II, Reed, Smith, Shaw & McClay, Pittsburgh, Pa., David L. Williams, The Bell Telephone Co. of Pa., Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant.

OPINION

WEBER, District Judge.

The unfortunate and unnecessary procedural tangle that this case has become is about to meet an inglorious end. Defendant has filed a motion for summary judgment in this action. Plaintiffs have since filed their second motion to remand. For the reasons stated below, we will deny plaintiffs' latest motion to remand and grant summary judgment in favor of the defendant Bell.

I. Facts and Procedural History

Plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases