Jose R., a minor, appeals from an order of the superior court continuing him as a ward of the juvenile court and committing him to the California Youth Authority for a maximum term of five years ten months. He contends that the court erred in failing to make an express finding of "probable benefit" to the minor of a Youth Authority commitment pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 734.
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
IN RE JOSE R.
Docket No. AO10717.
148 Cal.App.3d 55 (1983)
195 Cal. Rptr. 633
In re JOSE R., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JOSE R., Defendant and Appellant.
Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
October 18, 1983.
October 18, 1983.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Quin Denvir, State Public Defender, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, and Diane M. Griffiths, Deputy State Public Defender, for Defendant and Appellant.
John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, Thomas A. Brady and Ann K. Jensen, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
