STATE v. HUFFMAN

No. 10-81-04620; CA A24490.

672 P.2d 1351 (1983)

65 Or.App. 594

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. William Howard HUFFMAN, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided November 23, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James C. Niedermeyer, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was William C. Berkshire, Eugene.

Virginia L. Linder, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and William F. Gary, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., JOSEPH, C.J., and NEWMAN, JJ.


RICHARDSON, Presiding Judge.

Defendant was charged with perjury and conspiracy to commit perjury. He was found guilty of both charges by a jury; however, the court "merged" the conviction for conspiracy with the perjury conviction. Defendant appeals only the perjury conviction, asserting that prosecutorial misconduct requires dismissal and that erroneously admitted evidence justifies a new trial. We affirm.

We take the following facts primarily from the pretrial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases