1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 92 N.J.
  5. 92 N.J. 107 (1983)
 

IN RE FRIEDLAND

92 N.J. 107 (1983)

455 A.2d 1098

IN THE MATTER OF M. DANIEL FRIEDLAND, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided January 27, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Colette A. Coolbaugh, Secretary, argued the cause for complainant Disciplinary Review Board.

Jeffrey Barton Cahn argued the cause for respondent (Sills, Beck, Cummis, Zuckerman, Radin & Tischman, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

This disciplinary proceeding against respondent, M. Daniel Friedland, a member of the bars of Indiana and New Jersey, is based on a finding of professional misconduct made against him in the State of Indiana. On March 12, 1979, the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission instituted disciplinary proceedings against respondent in Indiana charging him with certain acts of unethical conduct. A hearing officer...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases