BYRD v. STRINGER

CA A22578, SC 29107.

666 P.2d 1332 (1983)

295 Or. 311

Clarence and Virginia BYRD, Respondents On Review, v. Marilyn STRINGER, Petitioner On Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided July 19, 1983.

Rehearing Denied September 7, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark J. Greenfield, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner on review.

Jeffrey J. Bennett, Portland, argued the cause for respondents on review. With him on the briefs were Diane Spies and Spies & Rune, P.C., Portland.

Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., William F. Gary, Sol. Gen. and Mary J. Deits, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, filed amicus curiae brief for Dept. of Land Conservation and Development.

Before LENT, C.J., and PETERSON, CAMPBELL, ROBERTS, CARSON and JONES, JJ.


ROBERTS, Justice.

We granted review to consider the applicability of statewide land use planning goals, in this case Goal 3 for agricultural lands, to county land use decisions after Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC) acknowledgment of a county's comprehensive plan and implementing ordinances.

The Polk County Board of Commissioners granted respondents a building permit for a dwelling in conjunction...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases