1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 705 F.2d
  5. 705 F.2d 1285 (1983)
 

HOWARD v. CHRYSLER CORP.

No. 81-1889.

705 F.2d 1285 (1983)

Delmer P. HOWARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHRYSLER CORPORATION, Chrysler Motors Corporation, Chrysler Financial Corporation, Chrysler Credit Corporation, and Chrysler Realty Corporation, Colorado Dodge, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

April 25, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Irvin M. Kent, Denver, Colo., for plaintiff-appellant.

Michael S. McCarthy of Conover, McClearn, Heppenstall & Kearns, P.C., Denver, Colo. (Frederic K. Conover II, Denver, Colo., with him on the brief), for defendants-appellees.

Before SETH, Chief Judge, and BREITENSTEIN and BARRETT, Circuit Judges.

SETH, Chief Judge.

The case was tried on two claims, one under the Automobile Dealer Franchise Act, and the other on a state claim of tortious interference with contractual relations. The proof advanced by the parties in nearly all respects went to both claims without a distinction being made.

There are several preliminary issues which need not be explored as the appeal can best be dealt with on the merits.

The proof in this Dealer Franchise Act cause...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases