DUTRA v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA

No. 16120-PR.

135 Ariz. 59 (1983)

659 P.2d 18

James E. DUTRA, Petitioner, v. The INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZONA, Respondent, Grecian Spa Fitness Center, Respondent Employer, St. Paul Fire & Marine Companies, Respondent Carrier.

Supreme Court of Arizona, In Banc.

Rehearing Denied January 23, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles M. Wilmer, P.C. by Charles M. Wilmer, Phoenix, for petitioner.

James A. Overholt, Acting Chief Counsel, Indus. Com'n of Arizona, Phoenix, for respondent.

Jones, Teilborg, Sanders, Haga & Parks, P.C. by J. Russell Skelton, Phoenix, for respondents employer and carrier.


CAMERON, Justice.

We granted James E. Dutra's petition for review of an opinion of the Court of Appeals, Division One, which affirmed the Industrial Commission's award of scheduled benefits under A.R.S. § 23-1044(B)(21). We have jurisdiction pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-120.24, and Rule 23, Arizona Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, 17A A.R.S.

We must answer only one question on appeal: Must scheduled disabilities under our workmen's compensation statute...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases