1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 575 F.Supp.
  5. 575 F.Supp. 1359 (1983)
 

HARPER v. ELI LILLY AND CO.

No. C79-2094.

575 F.Supp. 1359 (1983)

Karen HARPER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, E.D.

November 15, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas L. Dettelbach, Kahn, Kleinman, Yanowitz & Arnson, L.P.A., Cleveland, Ohio, for plaintiffs.

Marc L. Swartzbaugh, Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue, Cleveland, Ohio, Lane D. Bauer, Leo P. Dreyer, Shook, Hardy & Bacon, Kansas City, Mo., for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BATTISTI, Chief Judge.

This matter is before the Court today on defendant Eli Lilly and Company's Motion for Summary Judgment. Under F.R.C.P. 56, the Court must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion and may not grant summary judgment unless the movant has conclusively shown that no genuine issue of material fact exists. Smith v. Hudson, 600 F.2d 60

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases