1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 728 F.2d
  5. 728 F.2d 1181 (1983)
 

FENDLER v. GOLDSMITH

No. 83-1501.

728 F.2d 1181 (1983)

Robert Harold FENDLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert GOLDSMITH, and the Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided October 14, 1983.

As Amended March 21, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert H. Fendler, pro per.

Linda Akers, Asst. Atty. Gen., Phoenix, Ariz., for defendants-appellees.

Before ALARCON, CANBY, and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges.

REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:

While on trial in Arizona state court, Robert Harold Fendler did not fully comply with the Arizona state criminal discovery rules. These rules permit extensive discovery in criminal cases, by both prosecution and defense, and provide sanctions for noncompliance. Because Fendler did not provide the prosecution with the addresses of two potential witnesses, as required by these rules, the state trial court prohibited those witnesses from testifying...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases