1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 663 P.2d
  5. 663 P.2d 1244 (1983)
 

AMALGAMATED TRANSIT v. LANE CO. MASS TRANSIT

No. TC 16-82-07279; SC 29194.

663 P.2d 1244 (1983)

295 Or. 117

AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION, LOCAL DIVISION 757, Respondent, v. LANE COUNTY MASS TRANSIT DISTRICT, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided June 1, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph S. Kaufman, Baltimore, Md., argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were D. Christopher Ohly, and Melnicove, Kaufman, Weiner & Smouse, P.A., Baltimore, Md., and Bryson & Bryson, Eugene, Or.

Kalman D. Resnick, Chicago, Ill., argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Linda R. Hirshman, and Jacobs, Burns, Sugarman & Orlove, Chicago, Ill., and Roy Dwyer, P.C., Eugene, Or.

Before LENT, C.J., and PETERSON, CAMPBELL, ROBERTS, CARSON, and JONES, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff, Local Division 757, Amalgamated Transit Union (Union), moves to dismiss defendant Lane County Mass Transit District's (District) appeal on the grounds of lack of jurisdiction1 and mootness. District appealed from a circuit court order granting Union's motion for a preliminary injunction restraining District "* * * from altering the rights, privileges and benefits of the Union and its members existing prior to September...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases